RE: [coldbox:16098] Re: [Survey] What do you want in ColdBox?

Here, Luis dug up the URL for the Grails comparison we did some time ago:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AmT6VuockhXfcEFaX0FfZ0pBamJ3OXc2ZmQ2Mk1pS0E&output=html

We’re open to suggestions regarding other non-CF frameworks that would make a nice comparison or other comparison points that were left out.

Thanks!

~Brad

ColdBox Platform Evangelist
Ortus Solutions, Corp

E-mail: brad@coldbox.org
ColdBox Platform: http://www.coldbox.org
Blog: http://www.codersrevolution.com

Something I did think about was AOP v Others…

I am not sure if this goes outside the aspects of AOP, but there have been times when I don’t need the application to wait. Was reading the differences between AOP and Edmund, by Sean Corfield and the one thing that I seemed to only see as a difference, is that Edmund runs in async.

So my thoughts are, what if we have an option to not wait for the interception process to return?

I can see that the only solution to this would be to process as a thread, which I am not sure how this would affect the usage of Coldbox access from within the thread.

+1. I had a requirement for this some time ago as well and think it would be very useful.

Nolan Dubeau

Load .,8,1